Miscarriage of Justice Essay -- sensational criminal trials

arguably three of the around sensational abominable trials in American history are the Commonwealth vs. Borden, California vs. Simpson and Los Angeles vs. Rodney King. All three of these cases received unique amounts of media attention and verdicts from the jury that shocked the country. In my opinion justice, especi altogethery societal and moral justice, was not achieved in these trials. Social class, race and gender all had a huge impact on the jurys decisions in each of these cases. High priced defense attorneys were able to place reasonable enquiry in the minds of the jurors despite the substantial amount of evidence proving the seemingly obvious guilt of Borden, Simpson and the Los Angeles Police department. This publisher forget focus on these wretched trials and the fact that justice or moral rightness was not achieved by the outcome of the jury verdicts.The trial of Lizzie Borden, in June of 1893, c given(predicate)ivated the nation. It was covered extensively in n ewspapers throughout the country probably, in part, because it was extremely rare for a cleaning lady to commit a horrific act such as the one she was accused of. Being from a wealthy family that outwardly seemed smart and normal, made it very difficult for people to believe that a woman with her background could be responsible for the bludgeoning death of her father Andrew Borden, a overriding member of town, and her stepmother Abby Borden. The police, however, came to the conclusion that the Bordens murderer must have been undivided within the home since the house was otherwise untouched, nothing was missing and on that point was no sign of any commotion. The only person having both the origin and opportunity to commit these murders was Thirty three year old Lizzie Borden. present are some intriguing fa... ...ing was awarded a 3.8 million dollar settlement. This case, however, will surely haunt the LAPD indefinitely and caused further contention between an already distrusti ng, leery minority population and law enforcement.In conclusion, these extraordinary criminal trials hold their place in history as some of the most palpable miscarriages of justice. In all three cases, it is almost impossible to get over the enormity of the evidence convicting each of the defendants. These trials prove that peoples inborn preconceived notions regarding the way in which certain people are apt to behave can have more of an influence on an individuals opinion than solid evidence. I believe the defendants discussed in this paper were guilty of the crimes brought against them. It is a shame that our court system allows procedure and prescript to take precedence over justice.